Around Varese and its political choices
Civic? Ah...beautiful. It seems that none of the candidates in the upcoming municipal elections wants to be one centimeter less "civic" than the other. A festival of "civicittà".
The widespread disaffection with the party field has evidently fed and feeds this phenomenon. However, it is dangerous to accept everything uncritically sense doing the classic "lump."
The same speech to be made critically towards the parties, not all equally involved in the management of power. The question should be clear about local authorities, municipalities, provinces, regions where responsibility can not be absolutely charged in the same way among those who constitute the majority that administers and those sitting in opposition. It is a concept that I would reiterate to the experience gained in the Varese Municipal Council in 23 years as a councilor elected in the then Communist Party files. I voted in favor of hundreds of resolutions for work, services, taxes that seemed advantageous to the city, although sometimes be improved and improved on many occasions thanks to the opponents. I never voted a draft master plan, nor a budget of annual or multi-year forecast. Surely it must mean something.
To be even more clear and explicit. They are remembering varesine Mayors and Councils of the past. Well from 1951 to 1956 he was a "Bulgarian" to dominate the majority of Varese Town Council: 26 councilors elected from DC on the 40 whole assembly. They allowed two historical atrocities: the closure of the tramway, funicular to Sacro Monte and Campo dei Fiori and the demolition of the Teatro Sociale. All equally responsible?
The discourse on civic organizations should be explained and evaluated. For a long time the phenomenon has been restricted to small mountain or rural communities. The doctor, the teacher, the small business of the country took charge of gathering around him friends, acquaintances and sometimes much of the family with the intention of holding the most of their municipality. Programs but not bombastic show of good will, openness towards others, honesty and selflessness. All qualities that almost always sopperivano to technical and administrative preparation limits. The laws should have thought a good town clerk. Important was the direct knowledge of who you wanted to send to the Mayor or the City Council.
In medium and large municipalities other music. They were performed by the parties to present their lists those who believed the administration better prepared. Often, professionals, employees and workers emerged from the business world. People already proven in previous public works and outstanding for the passion shown towards the social problems of the community. In short, the parties were guarantors before the electorate, the excellence of the candidates presented. Frequently they had also taken care of the technical and administrative preparation through specific training courses.
Now the crisis of representation party has reassessed the voter / candidate's personal relationship by giving more responsibility to the citizen voter choices directly, without intermediaries. Here opened a boundless field to "good citizenship". All positive? The explosion of the candidates for mayor and lists to support them force us to reflect. Here too it would be wrong to make the lump. Make an uncritical glorification only seeing a very positive aspect of the direct participation of citizens in public affairs and failing to mention the limitations and pitfalls already in place in the shadow of good citizenship.
We see in the concrete case of Varese. A case of school. Among the sixteen lists at least a dozen states its reason for being in the distance from political parties. Emerges of all, the good will of exhibitionism to do good by unique characters market. Few or no references to past civic commitments at the street level or neighborhood to support even small battles in favor of the place. Suddenly, the discovery of the cause Municipal: surprising.
The only exception Varese 2.0 agronomist Daniele Zanzi that can boast at least three years of civic commitments. Opposition to parking in the Villa Augusta parks Giubiano or Villa Mylius, the legendary fight against bunkers parking lot of the First Chapel also passing by the rescue of dozens of non-native pines of the Formal Garden Estense. Lotte civic brought forward successfully through an appreciable capacity for initiative as to achieve a broad popular mobilization.
Everything else appears as a civic responsibility more proclaimed that practiced. A good citizenship under whose umbrella would seek salvation many who have gone bankrupt.
Here is the case of evaluating the party's attitude towards the new phenomenon. The Democratic Party has put his own man mayoral candidate of a center-left coalition, with a lot of non-hidden card in his pocket party. It is open to civil society by rewarding movementism, recognizing the value of true public spirit represented by Varese 2.0 with which it is compared to the primary. The League and the remnants of Varese Forza Italy are not even able to find a candidate for mayor in their ranks. Which is why resorted to a candidate defined "external" civic and not "succubus of parties." We joke? To respect the person of Paul Orrigoni will not write that it will be a hostage in the hands of the League and Forza Italy who misrule until now, but it will be affected by them. Constantly breathing down his neck spiratogli by Maroni and Salvini.
However difficult for the voter to extricate in judgments between the various lists which also includes personalities who have previously shared part of the administrative political path of the League and Forza Italy, now happily sided with those who want to turn the page definitely.
Today, no ifs, ands or buts, the watershed must be the judgment on nearly 25 years of municipal government in the League traction. We must answer the question: in Varese you live better or worse before the era of the League Northern League? An era in which all the spaces of power to the City, the Province, the Region were available to such political forces. If we recognize that we want to turn back Varese is consistently very page, breaking the continuity of a negative past?
There is no middle ground: either one supports the new, the will to work seriously for change in the city, or you give a positive rating to the Juntas Fumagalli and Fontana, and it confirms the past content with the usual promises. With attention to a bogus "civismo".
new title by: Good Morning INSUBRIA